Elsewhere in the same section, US historian William Polk, in a piece dated March 2003 ( Une sombre affaire / A Sombre Affair ), reviews the arguments given by the Bush Administration for the invasion of Iraq. Dismissing these as fantasies, he outlines the "hidden agenda determining American relations with Iraq: the new strategic conception of American world domination; the messianic faith in Christian fundamentalism; and the connection between Christian fundamentalism and Zionism."
This is a statement of enormous range.It is not my intent to argue about the truth or falsity of such a statement.
It is my interest how such statements come about.
I believe that a human being is so complex that all the above motives could exist without the individual having them all grouped together in a coherent belief system.
Words and Reason help us to create such a coherence. However, this coherent belief system is not absolutely necessary for an individual to act. The belief system expressed in words is more like a description of actions.
Actions and words, actions and words.
I disturbs me that a writer could discern the features of the face of our new neo-conservative Interregnum of 2000 to 2008 so early on. This is all a part of our Narrative of End of Times. We differ in the details, but almost all of us believe we are headed for destruction.
What happens when a majority of a society believes in inevitable doom?
We'll find out.
2 comments:
I had a long and erudite comment from Mr. Lawrence Page II here.
I decided I had to remove it since it had a number of links off-site.
This connectivity renders the comments an integral part of the blog, which does not seem the best idea as I do not know Mr. Page.
Post a Comment