Search This Blog

Thursday, January 01, 2015

Extra! Shooting Of Mother By Toddler Called "Terrible Incident"

Way To Go, Toddler !

I reproduce the Washington Post story:
The inside story of how an Idaho toddler shot his mom at Wal-Mart
By Terrence McCoy December 31, 2014
Veronica Rutledge and her husband loved everything about guns. They practiced at shooting ranges. They hunted. And both of them, relatives and friends say, had permits to carry concealed firearms. Veronica typically left her Blackfoot, Idaho, home with her gun nestled at her side. So on Christmas morning last week, her husband gave her a present he hoped would make her life more comfortable: a purse with a special pocket for a concealed weapon.

The day after Christmas, she took her new gift with her on a trip with her husband and her 2-year-old son. They headed hundreds of miles north to the end of a country road where Terry Rutledge, her husband’s father, lived. The father-in-law learned of the new purse.

“It was designed for that purpose — to carry a concealed firearm,” Rutledge told The Washington Post late Tuesday night. “And you had to unzip a compartment to find the handgun.

On Tuesday morning, that was exactly what Veronica Rutledge’s son did — with the most tragic of outcomes. Veronica, 29, arrived at a nearby Wal-Mart in Hayden with her three nieces and son, her gun “zippered closed” inside her new purse, her father-in-law said. Then, in the back of the store, near the electronics section, the purse was left unattended for a moment.

“An inquisitive 2-year-old boy reached into the purse, unzipped the compartment, found the gun and shot his mother in the head,” Rutledge said. “It’s a terrible, terrible incident.”

The aftermath has been crushing, he said. His son went to the Wal-Mart to collect his nieces and son, and no one now is sure what to say to the boy, who is not doing well.

“My son is terrible,” Rutledge said. “He has a 2-year-old boy right now who doesn’t know where his mom is and he’ll have to explain why his mom isn’t coming home. And then, later on his life, as he questions it more, he’ll again have to explain what happened, so we’ll have to relive this several times over.”

Rutledge isn’t just sad — he’s angry. Not at his grandson. Nor at his dead daughter-in-law, “who didn’t have a malicious fiber in her body,” he said. He’s angry at the observers already using the accident as an excuse to grandstand on gun rights.

“They are painting Veronica as irresponsible, and that is not the case,” he said. “… I brought my son up around guns, and he has extensive experience shooting it. And Veronica had had hand gun classes; they’re both licensed to carry, and this wasn’t just some purse she had thrown her gun into.”

The path Veronica Rutledge charted before her death, friends and family say, was one of academics and small-town, country living. “Hunting, being outdoors and being with her son” was what made her happiest, her friend Rhonda Ellis told The Post. She was raised in northeast Idaho and always excelled at school, former high school classmate Kathleen Phelps said, recalling her as “extremely smart. … valedictorian of our class, very motivated and the smartest person I know. … Getting good grades was always very important to her.”

She went on to graduate in 2010 from the University of Idaho with a chemistry degree, according to a commencement program. From there, she got a job at Battelle’s Idaho National Laboratory and published several articles, one of which analyzed a method to absorb toxic waste discharged by burning nuclear fuel.

While away from the lab, she and her husband, whom she married in 2009, spent time shooting guns. “She was just as comfortable at a camp ground or a gun range as she was in a classroom,” close friend Sheri Sandow said in an interview. On Facebook, she showed an interest in the outdoors and the National Rifle Association, and followed, a publication that reports on gun life.

“They carried one every day of their lives, and they shot extensively,” Rutledge said. “They loved it. Odd as it may sound, we are gun people.”

A lot of people in Idaho are. Earlier this year, the state legislature passed a bill that allows people to carry concealed guns onto state university campuses. And more than 85,000 people — 7 percent of the population — are licensed to carry concealed weapons, according to the Crime Prevention Research Center.

So many locals didn’t discern anything odd with 29-year-old woman carrying a loaded gun into a Wal-Mart during the holiday season. Stu Miller, a spokesman for the Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office, told the New York Times that it didn’t strike him as anything out of the ordinary. “It’s pretty common around here,” he said. “A lot of people carry loaded guns.”

Sandow told The Post she often sees people with a gun cradled at their side. “In Idaho, we don’t have to worry about a lot of crime and things like that,” she said. “And to see someone with a gun isn’t bizarre. [Veronica] wasn’t carrying a gun because she felt unsafe. She was carrying a gun because she was raised around guns. This was just a horrible accident.”

Of course it was an accident.
The question is how many accidents shall we allow to be acceptable?

The imagined threats to society are so great that the sale of guns and ammo sky-rocketed from 2008 to the present.
We are paying the price for our imagination.

How stupid we are is exemplified by our  obsessional fears; we keep thinking the past will repeat, because the past is the only thing we can conceptualize. The past is easy for our dullard minds, because it has already been done and we only have to be Monday morning fear-mongering quarterbacks.

The coming destruction will be ourselves. We shall implode and self-destruct. Not some financial order, not some region of the world.
We. Ourselves. We are going insane, and we shall arrive at the end of the road and the fulfillment of our quest we have painted with apocalyptical colors.



knutty knitter said...

Only point I would make is that a two year old will be into everything and they are fast!

Plan accordingly.

I've been round guns too but they stayed at the gun range or in the club safe. No exceptions especially after a friend was involved in the death of a kid and that was a freak accident too.

As for protection. Another friend (policeman) was killed with his gun right there.

I might add that those are the only two deaths I have personally known in 50 odd years. I'm glad our place doesn't allow guns on the street because it seems to me that if you have it, it will be used. Probably accidentally.


Montag said...

Of course, you are correct, but to plan accordingly for such occurrences pretty much ruin what was wanted in the first place: unfettered weaponry.

Consider the gun: it had to be light enough and have a trigger easy enough for a two year old.

Perhaps something a bit more weighty around toddlers would be in order, but that would require a bigger, more sturdy purse, and so on.

knutty knitter said...

Well then you have to consider the costs of unfettered weaponry and what is it worth to you. And remember that accidental shootings are apparently more common than any other form of shooting.

But then, people are always ruled by their hearts rather than by the actual statistics. I'm of the opinion that the media has a lot to answer for in this regard too.

In the end though the responsibility is personal. Of course, you also have to own that responsibility rather than blame others for what are your own actions.


Montag said...

I agree .

I am only terrified (not really- I have been expecting it for a while) that we have reached a point where we would be wise to have a cost/benefit analysis of unfettered weaponry... and we find that even then, we are unable to have such a analytical discussion.

We are walking a very thin line over the next few years.