I have been thinking about the previous post and wondering why it may be better to debate in small groups versus larger groups: what is it about "crowds" that make us irrational?
Well, I'm not sure it makes us irrational.
Let's assume there are at least 2 forms of communication when people come together: the first is language and statements, the second is emotion.
A very good example might be Sumo wrestlers, where the two opponents bow to each other before the match, thereby establishing respect for each other and mutual valuation. This is the emotional message.
This might be a good idea for debates: get together, establish mutual respect, maybe a moment of silence, then have at it.
It would certainly be better than the Cable TV format where there are at least two to five heads, one of which is speaking, and the others are smirking, grimacing, and generally being buffoons.
--
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment